Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Teachers Adda247

Teachers Adda247

CTET
2.3
Poor

73 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 73 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, teaching quality, study material. Many students highlight acknowledged as a 'brilliant teacher' by a critic (imp...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

There's an indirect acknowledgment of the teacher's inherent skill or experience, but no direct evid...

Teaching Quality

While one comment acknowledges the teacher's potential as 'brilliant', the current YouTube content i...

Study Material

The public YouTube content is largely perceived as lacking substance and not serving as effective st...

Doubt Support

There is no direct evidence from the comments regarding the teacher's provision of doubt support. Th...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
Implied potential as a 'brilliant teacher'
Provides 'information' (general)
Doesn't teach anything on YouTube
Videos are meaningless and nonsense
Content is confusing to children
Teacher's Experience3.0
Acknowledged as a 'brilliant teacher' by a critic (implies underlying skill/experience)
No direct comments on lack of experience, but poor content strategy suggests misuse of expertise.
Study Material2.0
Students thank for 'information'
Request for 'GK & GS Gyan Bhandar batch' implies value in other potential materials
Current YouTube videos are not seen as useful study material ('meaningless', 'nonsense')
Content is redundant ('When everything is known, what was the need to make a video?')
Doubt Support2.0
One video described as 'supportive'
No direct comments regarding specific doubt resolution or support mechanisms.
Tests & Practice2.0
Student expresses need to 'prepare for GK/GS' to clear exams (implies teacher's role in exam prep)
No comments directly mention tests, quizzes, or practice materials provided by the teacher.
Flexibility2.0
Fees vs Value1.0
Videos are seen as 'unnecessary attention' and 'meaningless', implying low value for time spent
Content is considered 'nonsense' and confusing, offering no perceived benefit
Teacher Personality2.0
Voice is described as 'extremely lovely' and 'super'
Some content is perceived as 'supportive' and 'motivational'
Accused of 'manipulating' students and seeking 'unnecessary attention'
Criticized for 'confusing the children' and losing student trust

Top Strengths

1. Pleasant and lovely voice

2. Ability to be supportive and motivational (in some instances)

3. Underlying potential as a 'brilliant teacher'

Areas to Improve

1. Improve content quality and substance on public platforms

2. Adopt ethical content strategies, avoiding manipulation and clickbait

3. Rebuild student trust by focusing on genuine educational value

What students love

“Thank you so much mam for information.”

2 likes

“This is a very supportive video, sir. Thank you for the motivation.”

1 likes

“Your voice is extremely lovely. Super and quite above expectations.”

1 likes

“Love this ma'am ji's voice.”

1 likes

“Thank you Sir. GK & GS Gyan Bhandar batch is not available, sir.”

1 likes

“Good morning sir.”

1 likes

“Thank you sir ji.”

“Thank you sir.”

“Good morning sir ji.”

“Thank you sir. I need to prepare for GK/GS so I can clear the next exam and get a job.”

What could be better

“When nothing in the syllabus has changed, and everyone knows the syllabus, what's the need for such a thumbnail? Just unnecessary attention.”

24 likes

“Shame on you, ma'am. A teacher's duty is to guide students, not manipulate them. You are a brilliant teacher, and if you do this stupidity, you will lose your students' trust.”

5 likes

“You don't teach anything on YouTube.”

4 likes

“This video is meaningless.”

4 likes

“When everything is known, what was the need to make a video?”

3 likes

“What a nonsense video. Why confuse the children?”

1 likes

Had a class with Teachers Adda247?