Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
The Institute of Construction Managment

The Institute of Construction Managment

NDA
4.6
Excellent

25 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 25 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, doubt support. Many students highlight good explanation for important points about concrete., ...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students consistently praise the teacher's clear explanations, simple language, and the practical re...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher demonstrates extensive practical experience, evident in the specific, real-world example...

Doubt Support

Students feel comfortable approaching the teacher with both academic and career-related questions, i...

Fees vs Value

While there are no direct comments on fees, the overwhelmingly positive feedback on teaching quality...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality5.0
Good explanation for important points about concrete.
Good and simple language, very nice.
Excellent!
Content resonates with real-world experience ('Yes, I have done late-night concrete work.', 'It's true 100%.')
Covers specific practical topics like 'Slump cone test and comprehensive strength test' and practical ratios ('3.5 'tagadi' (pans) in one cement bag', '1 'tagadi' is 17kg').
Teacher's Experience5.0
Content is highly practical and resonates with students' real-world experiences ('Yes, I have done late-night concrete work.', 'It's true 100%.')
Specific practical details shared ('3.5 'tagadi' (pans) in one cement bag', '1 'tagadi' is 17kg').
Study Material3.0
Specific topics like 'Slump cone test and comprehensive strength test' are covered, implying structured content.
One student requests a 'BBS (Bar Bending Schedule),' which might suggest a desire for more comprehensive or specific practical materials.
Doubt Support4.0
Students feel comfortable asking career advice ('Should I, and if so, how?').
Students feel comfortable asking eligibility questions ('Am I eligible to take a course at your institute?').
No direct comments on how doubts are resolved, only that they are asked.
Tests & Practice2.0
No mention of tests, quizzes, or practice exercises in the comments.
Flexibility3.0
No information provided in the comments regarding flexibility.
Fees vs Value4.0
The high praise for teaching quality and practical relevance suggests good value.
No direct mention of fees or value for money.
Teacher Personality4.0
Students feel comfortable asking personal career advice and eligibility questions, indicating an approachable and helpful demeanor.

Top Strengths

1. Teaching Quality (Clear, simple, practical explanations)

2. Teacher's Experience (Real-world, accurate, relatable content)

3. Teacher Personality / Doubt Support (Approachable, students feel comfortable asking questions)

Areas to Improve

1. Tests & Practice (No evidence of formal assessment or practice)

2. Study Material (Potential for more comprehensive practical resources like BBS)

3. Flexibility (Lack of information, potential area for improvement)

What students love

“Good explanation for important points about concrete.”

1 likes

“Good and simple language, very nice. Could you make a BBS (Bar Bending Schedule) for this, sir?”

“Excellent!”

“Yes, I have done late-night concrete work.”

2 likes

“It's true 100%.”

1 likes

“Slump cone test and comprehensive strength test.”

1 likes

“3.5 'tagadi' (pans) in one cement bag, 3.5 X ratio.”

“1 'tagadi' is 17kg, so 3 'tagadi' are equivalent to 1 cement bag.”

“Sir, I have completed my diploma and am now doing BTech. I want to do a job along with BTech. Should I, and if so, how?”

“Sir, I have done polytechnic civil engineering. Am I eligible to take a course at your institute?”

1 likes

Had a class with The Institute of Construction Managment?