Udaipur Classes

Hindi

1.7

Bad

13 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 13 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, flexibility, teaching quality. Many students highlight "ho gai vo class to 9 bje teaching ki" (implies classes a...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

There is no direct information in the comments to evaluate the teacher's experience level, leading t...

Flexibility

There is no direct evidence regarding the teacher's flexibility; the comment suggests adherence to a...

Teaching Quality

While some students report good test scores, there's a hint of rushed classes and serious ethical co...

Tests & Practice

While tests and practice papers seem to be part of the curriculum, their integrity is severely compr...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

"18/18 right" (suggests some students perform well, potentially due to teaching)

"Ho gai vo class to 9 bje teaching ki" (implies classes are conducted)

"Inti jldi khtm ho gi" (could imply rushed classes or insufficient content)

Ethical concerns about study materials may undermine perceived teaching quality

Teacher's Experience2.5

Study Material1.0

"3.5 ka question paper" (suggests question papers are provided)

"Sir, how do you get these papers? If we got them, we would go straight to jail." (Serious accusation regarding the unethical or illegal acquisition of study/exam papers)

Doubt Support1.0

"Sir, I messaged this number before, but got no reply." (Direct complaint about unresponsiveness to student queries)

Tests & Practice1.5

"18/18 right" (implies students are taking tests and performing well)

"3.5 ka question paper" (suggests question papers are used for practice or assessment)

"Sir, how do you get these papers? If we got them, we would go straight to jail." (Raises severe doubts about the integrity and legitimacy of the test papers used)

Flexibility2.5

"Ho gai vo class to 9 bje teaching ki" (implies classes adhere to a schedule)

Fees vs Value1.5

Serious ethical concerns and poor doubt support significantly diminish the perceived value for any potential fees.

Teacher Personality1.5

"Radha Radha" (a polite greeting, but very weak evidence)

Lack of responsiveness to student messages suggests indifference or poor professionalism.

The serious accusation about paper acquisition reflects poorly on the teacher's integrity and ethical conduct.

Top Strengths

1. Scheduled classes are conducted

2. Availability of question papers (though ethically questionable)

Areas to Improve

1. Ethical conduct and transparency regarding study materials/test papers

2. Responsiveness and doubt support for students

3. Overall integrity and professionalism

What students love

“19 ma sir Kesari Kesari Singh Bharat ho ga sir”

“18/18 right”

“Ho gai vo class to 9 bje teaching ki”

1 likes

“Radha Radha”

“3.5 ka question paper”

“English ki class kab aaegi”

“Bbbbbbbbbbbbb”

“Inti jldi khtm ho gi”

“This is a placeholder positive comment.”

“This is another placeholder positive comment.”

What could be better

“Sir, how do you get these papers? If we got them, we would go straight to jail.”