Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
UNWANTED EDUCATION

UNWANTED EDUCATION

Board ExamsScienceEnglish
1.6
Bad

85 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 85 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's flexibility, teacher's experience, teaching quality. Many students highlight students claim 'your channel's questions always appear in...

What students talk about most

Flexibility

The provided comments do not offer any insights into the teacher's flexibility regarding teaching me...

Teacher's Experience

While some students believe the teacher has experience in providing exam-relevant questions, this is...

Teaching Quality

The teaching quality is severely undermined by numerous complaints about fake content and incorrect ...

Study Material

The study material is a major point of contention, with some students finding it genuinely helpful f...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality1.0
Students express thanks for 'question & answer', implying some instructional value.
Accusations of 'wrong answers'.
'Fake question' and 'completely fake' content.
Teacher's Experience2.0
Students claim 'your channel's questions always appear in my exams', suggesting some familiarity with exam patterns.
Complaints of 'fake question' and 'wrong answers' contradict the idea of reliable expertise.
Study Material1.0
Praised for 'good, real questions', 'real questions in maths', and 'real question paper'.
Repeatedly labeled as 'fake question', 'completely fake', and containing 'wrong answers'.
Doubt Support1.0
A serious complaint states, 'Only members get right answers, and we get wrong ones', indicating a lack of equitable support.
Tests & Practice1.0
Comments like 'good, real questions' and 'real question paper' suggest the provision of practice material.
The authenticity of these materials is heavily disputed with comments like 'fake question' and 'all of these are fake'.
Flexibility3.0
Fees vs Value1.0
Some students express general gratitude ('You do so much for us'), implying perceived value.
Accusations of 'You teach for likes' and 'Only members get right answers, and we get wrong ones' suggest a manipulative or discriminatory value proposition.
The 'fake' content implies negative value.
Teacher Personality1.0
Students express thanks and appreciation ('Thank you sir', 'You do so much for us').
Accusations of 'You teach for likes' and 'You are very bad'.
The implication of intentionally providing wrong answers to non-members suggests a manipulative and unethical personality.

Top Strengths

1. Provides question and answer content.

2. Some students perceive the questions as relevant to exams.

3. Receives expressions of gratitude from some students.

Areas to Improve

1. Ensure authenticity and accuracy of all study materials.

2. Provide equitable and correct answers to all students, regardless of membership status.

3. Build trust and credibility by addressing accusations of fake content and manipulative practices.

What students love

Thank you so much sir for this question & answer.

1 likes

Thanks for your good, real questions!

2 likes

Sir, thank you. You do so much for us.

1 likes

Thanks sir, your channel's questions always appear in my exams.

Thank you sir for real questions in maths.

Sir, the math questions were all real.

Thank you Sir, this is real.

Thank you sir. This is a real question paper.

Sanskrit questions were real.

Thank you sir for the real question and answer.

What could be better

Fake question.

4 likes

You teach for likes.

2 likes

This is completely fake, this sir is completely fake.

2 likes

This is completely fake.

Sir, why are you uploading wrong answers? We trust you and study, but you give us wrong answers. Only members get right answers, and we get wrong ones. This is wrong.

Sir, all of these are fake.

You are very bad.

Had a class with UNWANTED EDUCATION?